This whole thing came to a head after watching the exceptionally unexciting press event by Square Enix yesterday, and being disappointed by the lack of any mention of Dragon Quest XI on the Switch (among many other things). I realize that it is already been made clear that there will be a delay on the Switch port, but I still thought that an update of sorts would be communicated despite that. There's also hope that it will be mentioned in Nintendo's press conference tomorrow, but I'm not holding my breath for it.
Then, I got to thinking about how Dark Souls: Remastered shared the same fate as Dragon Quest XI on the Switch, and why this is a bad thing for both developers and consumers. Now, I don't necessarily think that they are intentionally delaying things for some unforeseeable benefit, but they really need to strive to reign in its release windows to be more inline with other consoles.
Consider someone conscious of excessive spending and take one of their highly anticipated games (for me right now, Dragon Quest XI). If Dragon Quest XI releases on non-Switch consoles in September, but doesn't release on Switch until 2019, what do you think I'm going to do? Yeah, I'm totally buying it on PC and will likely not purchase it again for Switch for two reasons. One, I generally do not revisit games unless I just adore it and/or A LOT of time has passed between releases.
Second, it is hard to justify paying full price for the same experience on two different consoles, when the initial experience should be enough to sate my appetite. However, the DQXI could always go the Ys VIII PC port route (ie. be terrible), in which case I will just cry. My point is that it's a shame that I cannot choose to play the PC or Switch port within a reasonable time period of each other. If both were releasing around the same time, I would be hard pressed not to take advantage of the Switch's portability over the potential performance advantage of the PC port.
Of course, I could also choose to just hold out for the Switch version that is to release...sometime? Or perhaps I'll love it so much that I can justify purchasing it twice? While I may have the luxury to do douple dip, it simply isn't an option for some people, and should be of major concern for Switch developers. Some people just don't have the patience or resources to hold out for a Switch-specific port, no matter how enticing it might sound. Again, I am not suggesting that any developer delays things on purpose, but its a concern of mine regardless.
Perhaps developers are banking on it though? Maybe they feel that it isn't detrimental to delay something, as it might create enough space between console versions for the consumer to feel okay with purchasing it again and again? That could just be the pessimist coming out in me, but I can't shake the feeling that this same situation is bound to happen again soon, or even at Nintendo's conference later today.
What are your thoughts on these Switch-specific delays?
Editor. Indie Developer. Weight Lifter. Pit Bull Advocate. Tattoo enthusiast. Lover of Final Fantasy IV. All Around Nerd.
Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-3166-1959-0010
June 30, 2018 02:03:29 AM
|The initial delay was purely technical but I understand the frustration due to their
recent silence on the Switch version.
I'm pretty sure they don't want to obstruct the marketing of the PS4 version.
Specially due to the fact the Switch version will be the definitive one with extra content.
June 13, 2018 06:51:00 PM
|The main issues with the Switch port delay of Dragon Quest XI chiefly ties into engine.
The game was originally developed(for PS4) on an *older* version of the Unreal Engine development that didn't full support Switch development. When the Unreal engine added the update for full-on Switch support, the game was already being released in Japan which didn't leave much time to turn around without delaying the release massively while they also wanted to put on that major localization effort for the western release.
Mostly a large case of bad timing all around. This said like said, the delay might work in their favor. Even as it's attracting a lot of players, the Switch actually is drawing a large base of players completely different from other consoles. So releasing the Switch port later may well end up nothing close to a "loss" but truly increasing it's visibility in general.... kind of like the PC port of Monster Hunter World might actually add a lot of new breath into the game just at the very moment the PS4/Xbox players will have exhausted almost all of it's content... thus bringing out the game to an entirely new crowd at that very moment and keeping it in the spotlight anyway.
It's why the release of Generations Ultimate only this summer couldn't be perfect. Most of World's players are exhausted and there's already completely new players for whom World was their first Monster Hunter who're now buying a Switch just to play *more* Monster Hunter(no matter which one) this summer, because they've literally exhausted the gameplay they could get out of World already.
June 12, 2018 02:34:12 PM
|There must be technical issues with so many of the ports and games on Switch... maybe due to the hardware, or lack of power, compared to other consoles. Maybe something else. Or maybe Nintendo is putting pressure on the devs to take advantage of things that are only part of the Switch hardware, like the HD rumble, multiplayer options, or other sensors. Delays suck, but there's enough games out today to make the wait a non-issue. I'd rather wait a little longer if it means the game is all that much better at launch.
Want to leave a comment?